Original
Message:
-----------------
Landmark Implosion Looks Like WTC Collapse
Classic crimp and leaning mirrors
Building 7, South Tower
The controlled demolition of a North Texas building Saturday provided a stark reminder that WTC Building
7 and the twin towers could not have been brought down by any other means than planned implosion.
Watch the video of the Landmark Tower implosion in downtown Fort Worth and compare it to the South Tower of the WTC.
We see the classic crimp and leaning effects of controlled demolition in both cases.
The foundation of the building is blown first to weaken the structure and the building's 30 floors
are then quickly popped out one by one to ensure the building falls rapidly in its own footprint.
WTC workers who were inside the building before its collapse state that they were eyewitnesses to underground explosions that were totally separate from the plane impacts.
The building falls faster than the speed of gravity as was the case with the twin towers.
Reminiscent of 9/11, dust then quickly engulfs surrounding city blocks.
Adjacent buildings receive minor damage such as broken windows and yet we are to believe that falling
debris caused WTC 7, a 600 foot building that occupied an entire city block, to collapse in the late afternoon of September
11.
The twin towers and Building 7 were the first and only steel buildings to collapse from supposed fire
damage in history.
Firefighter dispatch tapes prove that there were no raging infernos inside the towers and the fires were nearly extinguished. Photos before
the collapse show a few minor fires in Building 7.
The Windsor Building in Madrid burned for nearly 24 hours as raging fires enveloped almost all of its 32 floors. The steel framed building did not collapse.
The South and North towers collapsed within 56 and 103 minutes of being hit by planes respectively.
What is wrong with this picture?
Original Message:
-----------------
hey
Barbara, thanx for 9/11 petitions & links/info.
I would ask u to please pass around my letter below that is the ONLY
hard evidence that will ever amount to anything on the World Trade Center because all other elements of conspiracy exist is
a catagory of supposed fact that a good lawyer will rip to shreds,
whereas my point on WTC 7, infamous Building 7, is
the part they cannot deny due to the way in which all large buildings are purposely imploded (brought down as a matter of
safety when damaged, such as the famous building in Las Vegas that was imploded on national tv coverage as a media spectacle
in recent years).
Read what I say & think about it &
if u can, please pass on to your whole network & ask
them to
consider focusing on the ONLY part of this case that can yield a VICTORY in court---
all other
elements cannot be made in a way that tough lawyers won't
enjoy either de-bunking or using "secret file" privilege or
simple "lack of evidence"
to shred.
peace thru vigilance,
Rob
=][=
--
hello everyone,
MY caveat
that helps to keep us from looking gullible as well as
WEAK conspiracy
theorists :
A critical issue in the DVD's & theories is of course the recordings/evidence
of the somewhat infamous
World Trade Center building # 7 (WTC 7) because the idea/conspiracy
is
BASED on the fact that it was imploded/destroyed deliberately
and thus we can finally----with evidence---
((since all other ground zero evidence is dead, gone and weak))....
well,
finally make a HARD case to our fellow countrymen.
BUT this is the crack in the egg----I have to tell you something I have seen
on other videos/reading materials/testimonials as well as FAMOUS CNN & national tv news from Sept.
11th :
As has been shown in reports & repeated ,
the big-shots who made decisions that infamous day had DECIDED
to destroy/implode Building 7 because of safety reasons, which does make sense....
that's old news ( recall the famous comment we decided
to PULL building 7... ).
It's not hard to imagine that proximity to the Twin Towers devastation meant that WTC
7 was a building whose foundation/structure was thus rocked to the hilt--
no one would EVER want to enter/work in such
a shaky structure after those events.
Well folks, everyone (except one DVD I watched) managed to
miss the ENTIRE point :
-----it does not matter that they destroyed Building 7,
because it was indeed damaged & would collapse or otherwise drop interior/exterior
debris killing innocent victims & firefighters & emergency heroes & workers later on.....
----------YET------
HERE's the MISSING smoking gun :
As professionals who implode buildings know,
it is IMPOSSIBLE
to implode a building
so safely and so well done (as seen on national tv that day, 9/11)
WITHOUT weeks or at least MANY days of preperartory studies of :
1) architectural plans ;
2) structural studies ;
3) final laying out of dangerous explosive charges, supportive wiring
that simpley CANNOT have been done in the confusing/disasterous hours of Sept. 11 amid
one of the largest most congested cities on earth.
Our NATION saw, on National TV on Sept. 11----
just how perfectly safe
the building imploded:
it fell to the ground almost as perfect as any professional implosion
without blowing out in various dangerous directions/destructive modes/mistakes.
All issues about whether or not to destroy building 7 are
a smokescreen.
The REAL issue is that imploded buildings take weeks or so to
prepare to bring down in such linear fashion that they don't fall all over the place endagering large areas
beyond the building's location.
It does't matter how many blocks are safely bordered-off from traffic/pedestrians....ALL professionals
who do this kind of work will take weeks/days to do something as dangerous as a
controlled building implosion of a large building.
NOT only this, but in the national and
city mayhem of destruction,
with
ALL available emergency personnel pushed to the limits and
giving their lives as
well as communication systems problems,
well folks, how did we miraculously muster a professional team to:
1) get organized & locate their ENTIRE team (some of which may not have even
been in the New York or Northeast Area;
2) quicky travel thru the dangerous-disaster World Trade Center destruction zone;
3) and thus implode a big city building at
ground zero
with death and destruction everywhere---
all within a tiny window
of hours while our citizens & 2 largest buildings were being blasted by fuel oil heat levels and death &
of critical emergency workers & innocent citizens?
Follow these questions----
FIND and INTERVIEW in COURT under OATH
the
very PERSONNEL who did this Building 7 implosion among the greatest hours of disaster in modern New York City.
THAT is the smoking gun,
NOT facts that are buried beneath
permanent rubble or destroyed permanently or otherwise too weak to prove beyond a doubt just what really
happened that fateful day.
Rob Mykoff | 
New to 9-11 Research?
